Bird-Watching Tourism: Global Industry Report (2025)

black binoculars on opened book

Bird-watching tourism (a.k.a. avitourism) is travel where the primary motive is to observe birds in their natural habitats; it sits within nature/wildlife tourism and overlaps with adventure and eco-tourism. European market guidance segments buyers into casual, enthusiastic, and hardcore birders—each with distinct trip depth and service needs.

Executive snapshot

  • Scale & momentum. Wildlife tourism overall generated ~US$344B in direct GDP impact pre-pandemic; bird-watching is a large and fast-growing slice of this wider category. (researchhub.wttc.org, Nature4Climate)
  • Participation (anchor market). In the United States, ~96 million people engage in birding; recent analyses tied to the 2022 national survey show >$100B annual spend by birders on trips & equipment. (The Wildlife Society)
  • Digital flywheel. The eBird community just passed ~2 billion bird sightings globally, underscoring explosive data-driven engagement; Merlin Bird ID usage and citizen-science events (Global Big Day, GBBC) continue to set records and broaden the funnel. (news.cornell.edu, Facebook, Great Backyard Bird Count)
  • Growth outlook. Independent market trackers peg the dedicated bird-watching tourism market at ~US$63B (2023) with ~6–6.5% CAGR this decade (range varies by firm)—indicative rather than definitive, but directionally consistent with the surge in participation. (Verified Market Research, Market.us, Grand View Research)

Demand for Bird-watching tourism: who’s traveling and why

  • Europe as a key source. The UK, Netherlands, Germany, Sweden are the largest European source markets; a sizable share of European wildlife travelers want birding as a core activity. Post-COVID, more millennials have entered the segment, aided by social media and apps. (cbi.eu)
  • North America & apps. The US is the anchor demand market by volume and spend; national data show large cohorts of backyard birders plus tens of millions traveling specifically to watch wildlife (including birds). (Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology)
  • Enthusiast behavior. Segmentation matters: casual birders accept blended wildlife trips; hardcore birders prioritize species targets, pre-dawn starts, and flexible itineraries over lodging frills. (cbi.eu)

Digital adoption indicators

  • eBird & events. Global Big Day 2025: ~69k participants from 200+ countries, 7,900+ species logged—numbers that reinforce truly global engagement. (Facebook)
  • Merlin Bird ID. Cornell’s Merlin app (sound/photo ID, offline packs) is now a mainstream on-ramp for beginners and a field tool for travelers. (merlin.allaboutbirds.org, Help Center)

Supply & value chain of Bird-watching tourism

  • Core players. Local lodges & hides; specialist tour operators/guides; destination marketing orgs (DMOs); conservation NGOs; national parks/permits; optics/gear brands; platforms (eBird, Merlin).
  • Job creation & inclusion. Training community bird guides and curating birder-friendly routes spread spend into rural areas (notably in South Africa’s avitourism programs). (birdlife.org.za)

Economics of Bird-watching tourism: what the money looks like

  • Macro envelope. Wildlife tourism ~US$343.6B globally (direct GDP). Bird-watching’s precise global share is not separately reported by UNWTO/WTTC, but independent trackers estimate a dedicated market of ~US$63B in 2023 growing at ~6%+ CAGR through 2030–33. Treat these as directional (methodologies vary). (researchhub.wttc.org, Nature4Climate, Verified Market Research, Market.us)
  • Country-level spend signals.
    • United States. Addendum to the 2022 National Survey shows ~96M birders and >$100B in trip/equipment outlays; broader “wildlife watching” contribution estimated at ~US$250B to the US economy. (The Wildlife Society, fishwildlife.org)
    • Australia. Tourism Research Australia data (reported by ABC) indicate A$2.6B in international visitor spend on bird-related travel (year to June 2024) plus A$636M from domestic overnights—up ~53% vs 2021. (ABC)
    • Event economics. Ohio’s Biggest Week in American Birding draws tens of thousands each May; reported local economic impact estimates range US$40–53M/year. (great-lakes-north-america.com, birdingwire.com)

Regional snapshots & case studies

  • Latin America (Colombia, Costa Rica).
    • Colombia (world leader in bird species) has seen a post-peace-accord boom in birding travel; studies demonstrate significant willingness-to-pay and benefits from bird-based tourism; national promotion has centered birding routes and fairs. (conservation-strategy.org, ScienceDirect, Procolombia, Vox)
    • Costa Rica (900+ species) continues to invest in infrastructure (e.g., new observation towers) to grow avitourism’s rural impact. (Tico Times, ict.go.cr)
  • Africa (South Africa). BirdLife South Africa’s GoBirding platform now lists 500+ sites; community-guide programs broaden local income capture—avitourists typically spend more and disperse farther than average nature tourists. (tourismupdate.com, birdlife.org.za)
  • Europe (UK/Spain).
    • The UK remains Europe’s largest source market; RSPB cites ~1.2M members, underscoring depth of the hobby. (cbi.eu, rspb.org.uk)
    • Spain’s Extremadura Birdwatching Fair (FIO) is the largest in southern Europe (2023 attendance ~18,500; 2025 edition expanded exhibitors), illustrating growing trade and consumer interest. (spain.info, juntaex.es, Cadena SER)
  • Asia (India). Participation is surging: GBBC India 2025 logged 66k+ checklists from 6,500 eBirders and 1,086 species (≈79% of India’s list) in just four days. Legacy sites like Keoladeo draw six-figure annual visitors (park revenue ₹2 crore in 2016–17), pointing to durable domestic demand. (Bird Count India, Hindustan Times)
  • North America (United States). Beyond national totals, local festivals (e.g., Laredo Birding Festival) activate regional economies and private-land access while amplifying conservation messaging. (Laredo Morning Times)

Bird-watching tourism seasonality & calendar

  • Spring & autumn migration windows drive premium, high-yield trips in both hemispheres; tropical rainforest & Andean elevational gradients offer year-round products.
  • Fairs & festivals (Global Birdfair/UK, FIO/Spain, Biggest Week/US) act as demand spikes and trade hubs that also channel donations to conservation (e.g., US$125k from Global Birdfair 2024 to BirdLife projects). (BirdLife International)

Bird-watching tourism enablers & tech trends

  • Citizen science → trip inspiration. eBird hotspots, status & trends layers, and Merlin’s sound/photo ID lower barriers for newcomers and help hardcore birders plan precise routes. (Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, merlin.allaboutbirds.org)
  • Data gravity. Cornell reports >2B cumulative sightings; large, open datasets now underpin itinerary design, biodiversity credits pilots, and conservation planning. (news.cornell.edu)

Bird-watching tourism sustainability, regulation & risk

  • Ethics. Sector norms discourage disturbance (e.g., ABA Code of Birding Ethics), including limits on playback, nesting disturbance, and drones; many parks restrict drones outright. Operators increasingly publish codes of conduct. (American Birding Association, Audubon)
  • Wildlife disturbance evidence. Meta-analyses show low-altitude drones (≤50 m) more likely to disturb nesting birds; prudent altitude buffers reduce risk. (journal.afonet.org)
  • Climate variability & disease. Changing phenology and avian influenza events are already reshaping seabird colonies and trip reliability in parts of Europe’s Arctic; resilience planning (timing, sites) is becoming material to operators. (AP News)

Bird-watching tourism competitive landscape

  • Destinations. Mature: USA, UK/Spain, Costa Rica. Rapid risers: Colombia, South Africa, parts of India. Differentiators include endemism, safety, guide quality, and birding infrastructure (hides, towers, boardwalks). (Vox, Procolombia, Tico Times)
  • Intermediaries. European operators dominate outbound niche birding; destination-based specialists and community guides increasingly sell direct (helped by CBI-style playbooks). (cbi.eu)

Bird-watching tourism market sizing

  • Top-down context. Wildlife tourism ≈ US$344B direct GDP (WTTC/Oxford). Bird-watching’s global sub-share isn’t separately published by UNWTO/WTTC, so treat any single global birding figure with caution. (researchhub.wttc.org)
  • Bottom-up anchors. Large, transparent anchors (US participation & spend; Australia’s TSA-linked spend breakout; festival impacts) support a robust multi-billion-dollar sub-sector worldwide and double-digit billions when including gear/feeder spend. (The Wildlife Society, fishwildlife.org, ABC, great-lakes-north-america.com)
  • Private forecasts. Multiple firms estimate a US$60–117B bird-watching tourism market by ~2030–33 with ~6% CAGR; use ranges and triangulate with public anchors above. (Verified Market Research, Market.us)

Bird-watching tourism strategy playbook (by stakeholder)

For destinations & DMOs

  1. Species-led routing. Publish seasonal birding routes, hides, and “birder-friendly” lodging lists; train community guides (South Africa model). (birdlife.org.za)
  2. Safety & access. Birders are sensitive to safety/logistics; invest in boardwalks/towers, signage, timed entry where needed (Costa Rica example). (Tico Times)
  3. Data partnerships. Integrate eBird hotspot data and Merlin content into official trip planners (with attribution). (Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, merlin.allaboutbirds.org)

For tour operators & lodges

  1. Segment the product. Offer separate tracks for casual vs. hardcore (flex mealtimes, pre-dawn starts, target lists). (cbi.eu)
  2. Ethics as UX. Publish playback/drone/nest-disturbance policies up front; align with ABA/BirdLife codes. (American Birding Association, Amazon Web Services, Inc.)
  3. Festival flywheel. Sell around peak migration windows and anchor events (FIO, Global Birdfair, Biggest Week). (spain.info, BirdLife International, National Geographic)

For investors & conservation funders

  1. Rural yield. Birding routes and guide training have outsized local multipliers; look for projects that combine endemism + accessibility + community ownership. (birdlife.org.za)
  2. Impact data. Tie revenue shares or visitor levies to conservation outcomes; piggyback on eBird/NGO monitoring to verify. (Birds, Cornell Lab of Ornithology)

Bird-watching tourism risks & mitigations

  • Overuse of sensitive sites. Manage with permits, caps, and guide-only zones; enforce no-drone areas in breeding seasons. (journal.afonet.org)
  • Climate & disease shocks. Diversify calendars and regions (e.g., mix seabird cliffs with woodland migration sites) and maintain flexible booking policies. (AP News)
  • Data-integrity & expectations. Use eBird records to set realistic target lists; communicate that “heard-only” and ethical non-use of playback may reduce hit-rates but protects birds. (American Birding Association)

India annex (quick read)

  • Participation: GBBC India 2025 recorded 66,155 checklists and 1,086 species by ~6,500 birders in four days—showing strong grassroots energy. (Bird Count India)
  • Flagship sites: Keoladeo drew ~147,000 visitors and crossed ₹2 crore park revenue in 2016–17; migration corridors (e.g., Sundarbans, Western Ghats, NE India) are ripe for route development and guide training. (Hindustan Times)
  • Actionables: State tourism + forest departments can co-publish seasonal birding circuits, standardize guide certification, and tie festival calendars to migration peaks (Feb–Apr; Oct–Dec), while aligning operator codes with ABA/BirdLife guidance. (American Birding Association, Amazon Web Services, Inc.)

Sources & notes


Bottom line

Bird-watching tourism is a high-growth, high-engagement niche within nature tourism that channels meaningful spend into rural landscapes, often where conservation dividends are highest. The next five years will be defined by data-driven trip planning (eBird/Merlin), destination infrastructure (hides/boardwalks), ethics-by-design operations, and emerging-market stars (Colombia, South Africa, India) scaling with safety and access. If you build for the species + season + ethics + access equation, the birds—and the birders—will come.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *